Cadaveric Workshop and Implications in Regional Anaesthesia
Vol 2 | Issue 1 | January-June 2021 | Page 22-28 | Ramkumar Mirle, Sajana Mukundan
Authors: Ramkumar Mirle [1], Sajana Mukundan [1]
[1] Department of Anaesthesia, Columbia Asia Referral Hospital, Yeshwanthpur, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Ram Kumar M. M,
Consultant Anaesthesiologist, Columbia Asia Referral Hospital, Yeshwanthpur, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: mirleram@gmail.com
Introduction
The human cadavers have always been an immense source of knowledge from time immemorial and have been aptly termed as “Silent teachers” [1]. Cadaver dissection has been the basis of teaching anatomy to aspiring anaesthesiologist to develop their skills in regional anaesthesia. The practice of regional anaesthesia has evolved from the landmark based technique eliciting paraesthesia to peripheral nerve stimulation-guided technique and in the recent times to use of ultrasound guided (USG) technique alone or a combination of (PNS) and USG – Dual Modality. Successful regional nerve block technique can be a combination of any of these techniques with the most reliable modality depending on the expertise of the performer. In order to excel we need to be appropriately trained akin to a real-life scenario. The cadaver workshop has not only facilitated understanding anatomy but also helped in acquiring practical clinical skills.
References
1. Loukas M, Lanteri A, Ferrauiola J, Tubbs RS, Maharaja G, Shoja MM, et al. Anatomy in ancient India: A focus on the Susruta Samhita. J Anat. 2010;217(6):646–50.
2. Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: A historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48(3):153–69.
3. Bohl M, Bosch P, Hildebrandt S. Medical students’ perceptions of the body donor as a “First Patient” or “Teacher”: A pilot study. Anat Sci Educ. 2011;4(4):208–13.
4. Bharambe V, Puranam V, Manvikar PR, Bajpayee P. Anatomy acts in India: a review. Eur J Anat. 2019;23(6):469–77.
5. Kirchmair L, Entner T, Wissel J, Moriggl B, Kapral S, Mitterschiffthaler G. A study of the paravertebral anatomy for ultrasound-guided posterior lumbar plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(2):477–81.
6. Wedel DJ. Don’t try this at home! Vol. 91, Anesthesia and analgesia. United States; 2000. p. 771–2.
7. Eisma R, Wilkinson T. From “Silent Teachers” to Models. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(10):1–5.
8. Tsui BCH, Dillane D, Walji AH. Cadaveric ultrasound imaging for training in ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks: Upper extremity. Can J Anesth. 2007;
9. Chuan A, Lim YC, Aneja H, Duce NA, Appleyard R, Forrest K, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing meat-based with human cadaveric models for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(8):921–9.
10. Diwan S, Feigl GESRA19-0487 Cadaveric studies and its impact on regional anaesthesiaRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2019;44:A60-A62.
11. McDonnell JG, O’Donnell BD, Farrell T, Gough N, Tuite D, Power C, et al. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: A Cadaveric and Radiological Evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(5):399–404.
12. Tran TMN, Ivanusic JJ, Hebbard P, Barrington MJ. Determination of spread of injectate after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: A cadaveric study. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(1):123–7.
13. Sharma M, Macafee D, Pranesh N, Horgan AF. Construct validity of fresh frozen human cadaver as a training model in minimal access surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2012;16(3):345–52.
14. Munirama S, Eisma R, Columb M, Corner GA, McLeod GA. Physical properties and functional alignment of soft-embalmed Thiel human cadaver when used as a simulator for ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(5):699–707.
15. Tsui BCH, Dillane D, Pillay J, Walji A. Ultrasound imaging in cadavers: Training in imaging for regional blockade at the trunk. Can J Anesth. 2008;55(2):105–11.
16. Tube AC, Use FOR, Sacs C. 336 sciencf! 1922;LX(1554).
17. Barrington MJ, Wong DM, Slater B, Ivanusic JJ, Ovens M. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: How much practice do novices require before achieving competency in ultrasound needle visualization using a cadaver model. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(3):334–9.
18. Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Rozen WM, Hebbard P. Spread of injectate after ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block: A cadaveric study. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(7):745–50.
19. Biswas A, Castanov V, Li Z, Perlas A, Kruisselbrink R, Agur A, et al. Serratus Plane Block: A Cadaveric Study to Evaluate Optimal Injectate Spread. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(8):854–8.
20. Carline L, McLeod GA, Lamb C. A cadaver study comparing spread of dye and nerve involvement after three different quadratus lumborum blocks. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(3):387–94.
21. Vidal E, Giménez H, Forero M, Fajardo M. Erector spinae plane block: A cadaver study to determine its mechanism of action. Rev Española Anestesiol y Reanim (English Ed [Internet]. 2018;65(9):514–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2018.09.002.
How to Cite this Article: Mirle R, Mukundan S | Cadaveric Workshop and Implications in Regional Anaesthesia | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | January-June 2021; 2(1): 22-28. |