Posts

Effectiveness of Using Ultrasound-Inferior Venacava Collapsibility Index (IVCCI) as a Guidance Tool for Resuscitating the Patients Undergoing Emergency Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries Under Spinal Anaesthesia

Vol 5 | Issue 1 | January-June 2024 | Page 24-29| S. Narmatha Yangste, S. Shankar Raju, Bhaskar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2024.v05.i01.087


Authors: S. Narmatha Yangste [1], S. Shankar Raju [2], Bhaskar [3]

[1] Department of Anesthesiology, Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
[2] Department of Anesthesiology, ESI medical college, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
[3] Department of Anesthesiology, Dharmapuri Medical College, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu, India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. S. Narmatha Yangste,
Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: nyangtse75@gmail.com


Abstract

Background and Aim: Ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) is used for assessing the volume status of the patient in critical care but for emergency cases taken up under spinal anesthesia this index helps to assess the adequacy of resuscitation. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound in adequately resuscitating patients requiring subarachnoid block for emergency lower limb orthopedic surgeries.
Methods: After obtaining approval from the Coimbatore Medical College institutional ethical committee, 60 adults aged between 20 and 60 comprising both sexes requiring emergency lower limb [shaft of femur] orthopedics surgeries were included in this randomized clinical study. After a complete pre-anaesthetic assessment, IVCCI by ultrasound is measured. The patient was resuscitated to a target IVCCI of ≤30% before performing the subarachnoid block from the USG group. The other group of patients was resuscitated till the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was≥65 mm Hg from the MAP group. Then spinal anaesthesia was performed in a sitting position via L3 – L4 interspace using a 25 G Quincke’s needle. The parameters were monitored every 5 minutes for 30 minutes post-spinal.
Results: The incidence and severity of hypotension are lesser in the ultrasound group compared to the MAP group which was statistically significant (p=0.004).
Conclusion: Our study concludes that the USG-guided fluid resuscitation with a target IVCCI ≤30% for emergency surgeries under spinal anaesthesia does reduce the severity of hypotension and its adverse outcomes.
Keywords: Inferior vena cava, Lower limb, Fracture, Mean arterial pressure, Ultrasound, Spinal anesthesia


References


1) B Ayyanogouda, BC Ajay, Chhaya joshi et al., Role of ultrasonographic inferior venacaval assessment in averting spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension for hernia and hydrocele surgeries-A prospective randomised controlled study, Indian J Anaesth2020 Oct;64(10): 849-854. 1.
2) Ceruti S, Anselmi L, Minotti B, Franceschini D, Aguirre J, Borgeat A, Saporito A. Prevention of arterial hypotension after spinal anaesthesia using vena cava ultrasound to guide fluid management. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Nov 23. PMID: 29397116.
3) M J Kaptein,Elaine M Kaptein, Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index: Clinical Validation and Application for Assessment of Relative Intravascular Volume,Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2021 May 28(3): 218-226..
4) Zhang J, Critchley LA. Inferior vena cava ultrasonography before general anesthesia can predict hypotension after induction. Anesthesiology. 2016 Mar 1;124(3):580-9.
5) E R Salama, Mohamed Elkashlan, Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of inferior vena cava collapsibility index and caval aorta index as new predictors for hypotension after induction of spinal anaesthesia: A prospective observational study, Eur J anesthesiol 2019 Apr;36(4):297-302.
6) M Szabo,Anna Bozo, Katalin Darvas et tal,. Role of inferior vena cava collapsibility index in the prediction of hypotension associated with general anesthesia: an observational study BMC anaesthesiology 2019 Aug 7;19(1):139.
7) T Saranteas,H spiliotaki,L koloantzaki et tal ,The Utility of Echocardiography for the Prediction of Spinal-Induced Hypotension in Elderly Patients: Inferior Vena Cava Assessment Is a Key Player, J cardiothoracic Vasc Anesth 2019 Sep; 33(9): 2421-2127.
8) Shyam Sundar Purushothaman , Ani Alex , Rajesh Kesavan , Sindhu Balakrishnan Sunil Rajan , Lakshmi Kumar , Ultrasound Measurement of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility as a Tool to Predict Propofol-Induced Hypotension, Anesth Essays Res. Apr-Jun 2020;14(2):199-202.
9) Arthur K Au , Dean Steinberg , Christopher Thom , Maziar Shirazi , Dimitrios Papanagnou et tal, Ultrasound measurement of inferior vena cava collapse predicts propofol-induced hypotension, Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;34 (6):1125-8.
10] A A Dodhy et tal,Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index and Central Venous Pressure for Fluid Assessment in the Critically Ill Patient, J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Nov;31(11): 1273-1277..
11) Huang B, Huang Q, Hai C, Zheng Z, Li Y, Zhang Z. Height-based dosing algorithm of bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for decreasing maternal hypotension in caesarean section without prophylactic fluid preloading and vasopressors: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open. 2019 May 16;9(5):e024912.
12) Hartmann B et al. The incidence and risk factors for hypotension after spinal anesthesia induction: An analysis with automated data collection. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1521-9.
13) Carpenter RL et al,. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1992;76:906-16
14) Singh J et al,. Effect of preloading on hemodynamic of the patient undergoing surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2010;8:216-21.
15) Khan MU et al,. Preload versus coload and vasopressor requirement for the prevention of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension in nonobstetric patients. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015;25:851-5.
16) S Mohammed et al,. Indian J Anaesth., 2021 Oct;65(10): 731-737. Prediction of post induction hypotension in young adults using ultrasound derived inferior venacava parameters: An observational study.


How to Cite this Article: Raju SS, Yangste SN, Kalyanasundaram K | Effectiveness of Using Ultrasound-Inferior Venacava Collapsibility Index (IVCCI) as a Guidance Tool for Resuscitating the Patients Undergoing Emergency Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries Under Spinal Anaesthesia | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | January-June 2024; 5(1): 24-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2024.v05.i01.87


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)


Pendant Positioning Vs Traditional Sitting for Successful Spinal Punctures in Elderly

Vol 4 | Issue 2 | July-December 2023 | Page 9-13 | Tamasi Dawn, Yatindra Kumar Batra, Sunny Rupal, Komal Jit Kaur, Tanvir Samra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i02.076

Submitted: 10-08-2023; Reviewed: 06-09-2023; Accepted: 24-10-2023; Published: 10-12-2023


Authors: Tamasi Dawn [1], Yatindra Kumar Batra [1], Sunny Rupal [1], Komal Jit Kaur [1], Tanvir Samra [2]

[1] Department of Anaethesiology Max superspeciality Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India.
[2] Department of Anaesthesia PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Tanvir Samra,
Associate Professor Department of Anaesthesia PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
E-mail: drtanvirsamra@yahoo.co.in


Abstract

Background- The ability of the pendant position in increasing the intervertebral spaces translating in an increase in the 1st attempt spinal puncture success rate has been reported in pregnant females undergoing cesarean section. However, the same has not been done for the elderly patients in which age-related degenerative anatomical changes, decreased lordosis, disseminated sclerosis, and extensive osteophytosis is known to reduce the intervertebral space.
Materials and Methods- A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in patients aged 60-80 years undergoing urological surgeries after approvalfrom the Institutional Ethics Committee and written informed consent from the patients. Primary aim was to compare the number of bone contacts during administration of subarachnoid block with the patient in either pendant (Group A) or traditional (Group B) position. Secondary aims were to compare the proportion of successful spinal needle placements, ease of palpation of spinous processes, patient’s comfort, number of spaces used, time to perform spinal puncture, time to reach grade III (as per modified bromage score) motor blockade, time to reach T10 sensory level and rate of complications in both the groups.
Results- Demographic data was comparable and there was no statistical difference in number of bone contacts, ease of administration, success of spinal needle placements, performance times of subarachnoid block and duration of spinal anaesthesia in both the groups. Complication rates were comparable.
Conclusion- Pendant positioning does not confer any advantage over the traditional sitting position in success rates and performance characteristics of subarachnoid block in elderly (60-80 years) patients scheduled for urological surgeries.
Keywords: Pendant position, Spinal-bone contact, Spinal Needle Puncture, Lumbar puncture, Spinal anesthesia, Aged


References


1. de Filho GR, Gomes HP, da Fonseca MH, Hoffman JC, Pederneiras SG, Garcia JH. Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 ;19:447–51.
2. Lerner S, Gutlerman P, Jenkins F. Epidural hematoma and paraplegia after numerous lumbar punctures. Anesthesiology. 1973; 39:550-1.
3. Owens E, Kasten G, Hessel E II. Spinal subarachnoid hematoma after lumbar puncture and heparinization. AnesthAnalg. 1986; 65:1201-7.
4. Flaatten H, Felthaus J, Larsen R, Bernhardsen S, Klausen H. Postural post-dural puncture headache after spinal and epidural anaesthesia. A randomised, double-blind study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:759–64.
5. Flaatten H, Berg CM, Brekke S, Holmaas G, Natvik C, Varughese K. Effect of experience with spinal anaesthesia on the development of post-dural puncture complications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43:37–41.
6. Horlocker TT, McGregor DG, Matsushige DK, Schroeder DR, Besse JA. A retrospective review of 4767 consecutive spinal anesthetics: central nervous system complications. Perioperative Outcomes Group. AnesthAnalg. 1997;84:578–84.
7. Pryambodho P, Mahdi Nugroho A, Januarrifianto D. Comparison Between Pendant Position and Traditional Sitting Position for Successful Spinal Puncture in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;7:e14300.
8. Arshad QUA, Jadoon H, Raza A, Furqan Z, Shahani YA. Comparison of successful spinal puncture betweenpendant position and traditionalsitting position for cesarean deliveries. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2020;24:603-610
9. Shabanian G, Saadat M. A Position for Administration of Difficult Spinal Anesthesia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:190–1.
10. Park CO. Diurnal variation in lumbar MRI. Correlation between signal intensity, disc height, and disc bulge. Yonsei Med J. 1997;38:8–18.
11. Movasseghi G, Hassani V, Mohaghegh MR, Safaeian R, Safari S, Zamani MM, et al. Comparison Between Spinal and General Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Anesth Pain Med2013;4:e13871.
12. Chohedri A, RaeesiEstabragh R, Eghbal MH, Sahmeddini MA, Eftekharian H, Shahabifar R. Comparing the Duration of Spinal Anesthesia Induced With Bupivacaine and a Bupivacaince- Lidocaine Combination in Trans-Urethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP). Anesth Pain Med 2015;5: e25675.
13. Faiz SH, Rahimzadeh P, Sakhaei M, Imani F, Derakhshan P. Anesthetic effects of adding intrathecal neostigmine or magnesium sulphate to bupivacaine in patients under lower extremities surgeries. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17:918–22.
14. Tessler MJ, Kardash K, Wahba RM, Kleiman SJ, Trihas ST, Rossignol M. The performance of spinal anesthesia is marginally more difficult in the elderly. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999; 24:126-30.
15. Chin KJ, Karmakar MK, Peng P. Ultrasonography of the adult thoracic and lumbar spine for central neuraxial blockade. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:1459–85.
16. Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Anesthesia for genitourinary surgery. In: Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD, editors. Morgan and Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology. US: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013. pp. 671–90.
17. Fisher KS, Arnholt AT, Douglas ME, Vandiver SL, Nguyen DH. A randomized trial of the traditional sitting position versus the hamstring stretch position for labor epidural needle placement. AnesthAnalg. 2009;109:532–4


How to Cite this Article:  Dawn T, Batra YK, Rupal S, Kaur KJ, Samra T | Pendant Positioning Vs Traditional Sitting for Successful Spinal Punctures in Elderly | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | July- December 2023; 4(2): 9-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i02.076


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)