Posts

Thoracic Wall Blocks for Thoracic Surgery

Vol 4 | Issue 2 | July-December 2023 | Page 01-08 | Neha Pangasa, Anjolie Chhabra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i02.075

Submitted: 08-07-2023; Reviewed: 01-09-2023; Accepted: 09-10-2023; Published: 10-12-2023


Authors: Neha Pangasa [1], Anjolie Chhabra [1]

[1] Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Neha Pangasa
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Email- nehapangasa@gmail.com


Abstract

Thoracic epidural, paravertebral block and intercostal nerve block were the conventional methods of providing analgesia for thoracic surgery, about a decade ago. In the modern era with the advent of ultrasound guided regional anesthesia, the fascial plane blocks came as a boon to anesthesiologists. These blocks are safer, as the needle tip remains distant from the pleura and they are technically easier to perform. We have described in brief the various techniques for thoracic wall analgesia with special emphasis to fascial plane blocks, along with the current evidence for each block.
Keywords: Thoracic wall blocks, Fascial plane blocks, Local anaesthetic


References


1. Chin KJ, Pawa A, Forero M, Adhikary S. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the thorax: pectoral I and II, serratus anterior plane, and erector spinae plane blocks. Advances in Anesthesia 2019; 37: 187–205.
2. Nair S, Gallagher H, Conlon N. Paravertebral blocks and novel alternatives. BJA Education 2020, 20(5): 158-65.
3. Karmakar MK. Thoracic Paravertebral Block. Anesthesiology 2001; 95:771– 80.
4. Yeung JHY, Gates S, Naidu BV, Leuwer M, Gao Smith F. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011; 5. Art. No.: CD009121.
5. Lönnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, Conacher ID. Paravertebral blockade: failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 1995 Sep;50(9):813-5.
6. Chhabra A, Chowdhury AR, Prabhakar H, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Srivastava A, Kalaivani M. Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021(2).
7. Chin KJ, Versyck B, Pawa A. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: a state of the art review. Anaesthesia 2021, 76: 110–26.
8. Elsharkawy H, Pawa A, Mariano ER. Interfascial plane blocks: back to basics. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018; 43: 341–6.
9. Blanco R. The ‘pecs block’: a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 847–8.
10. Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras MT. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Revista Espanola De Anestesiologia Y Reanimacion 2012; 59: 470–5.
11. Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 1107–13.
12. Johnston DF, Black ND, O’Halloran R, Turbitt LR, Taylor SJ. Cadaveric findings of the effect of rib fractures on spread of serratus plane injections. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2019; 66: 738–9.
13. Chin KJ ,Kariem ,Boghdadly KE. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anesth 2021; 68:387–408.
14. Moustafa MA, Alabd AS, Ahmed AM, Deghidy EA. Erector spinae versus paravertebral plane blocks in modified radical mastectomy: Randomised comparative study of the technique success rate among novice anaesthesiologists. Indian J Anaesth 2020;64:49-54.
15. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2016 Sep 1;41(5):621-7.
16. Yang H.M ,Choi Y.J, Kwon HJ, J. O, Cho T.H, Kim S.H. Comparison of injectate spread and nerve involvement between retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks in the thoracic region: a cadaveric study. Anaesthesia 2018, 73, 1244–50.
17. Ivanusic J, Konishi Y, Barrington M.J. A Cadaveric Study Investigating the Mechanism of Action of Erector Spinae Blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43: 567–71.
18. Huang W, Wang W , Xie W , Chen Z , Liu Y. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in breast and thoracic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin Anesth 2020; 66: 109900.
19. Adhikary SD, Liu WM, Fuller E, Cruz-Eng H, Chin KJ. The effect of erector spinae plane block on respiratory and analgesic outcomes in multiple rib fractures: a retrospective cohort study. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 585–93.
20. Jüttner T, Werdehausen R, Hermanns H , Enrico Monaca E, Oliver D, Pannen B.H et al. The paravertebral lamina technique: a new regional anesthesia approach for breast surgery. J Clin. Anesth. 2011; 23, 443–50.
21. Murouchi T, Yamakage M. Retrolaminar block: analgesic efficacy and safety evaluation. J Anesth 2016;30(6):1003-07.
22. Wang Q, Wei S, Li S, Yu J, Zhang G, Ni C et al. Comparison of the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block and ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in Uniportal video-assisted Thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1229.
23. Costache I, Neumann LD, Ramnanan C.J, Goodwin S.L, Pawa A, Abdallah F.W et al. The mid-point transverse process to pleura (MTP) block: a new end-point for thoracic paravertebral block. Anesthesia 2017; 72(10): 1230-36.
24. Chen XU, Yang J, Xia M, Wu H, Wang S, Zhang W. Postoperative Analgesia After Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J.Cardiothorac.Vasc. Anesth.2022; 36 : 2432-38.
25. Shibata Y, Kampitak W, Tansatit T. The Novel Costotransverse Foramen Block Technique: Distribution Characteristics of Injectate Compared with Erector Spinae Plane Block. Pain Physician. 2020 Jun;23(3):E305-E314. PMID: 32517407.
26. Nanda S, Bhoi D, Pangasa N, Jain D. Multiple injection costotransverse block for chronic pain in a patient with granulomatous mastitis. Indian J Anaesth 2021;65:772-4.
27. Chin KJ. Thoracic wall blocks: From paravertebral to retrolaminar to serratus to erector spinae and back again-A review of evidence. Best Pract.Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol 2019;33: 67-77 .
28. Pascarella, G.; Costa, F.; Nonnis, G.; Strumia, A.; Sarubbi, D.; Schiavoni, L.; Di Pumpo, A.; Mortini, L.; Grande, S.; Attanasio, A.; et al. Ultrasound Guided Parasternal Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Study. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2060.
29. Diwan S, Nair A. Ultrasound‐guided bilateral parasternal block: A boon for managing pain after sternal fracture/ dislocation. Saudi J Anaesth 2020;14:224‐7.
30. Versyck B, Geffen GJV , Chin KJ. Analgesic efficacy of the Pecs II block: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 663–73.
31. Hussain N, Brull R, McCartney CJL, et al. Pectoralis-II myofascial block and analgesia in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2019; 131: 630–48.
32. Liu XC, Song TT, Xu HY, Chen XJ, Yin PF, Zhang JJ. The serratus anterior plane block for analgesia after thoracic surgery: A meta- analysis of randomized controlled trails. Medicine 2020;99:21(e20286).
33. Beard L, Hillermann C, Beard E, et al. Multicenter longitudinal cross-sectional study comparing effectiveness of serratus anterior plane, paravertebral and thoracic epidural for the analgesia of multiple rib fractures. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 0 :1-6.


How to Cite this Article: Pangasa N, Chhabra A | Thoracic Wall Blocks for Thoracic Surgery | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | July-December 2023; 4(2): 01-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i02.075


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)


Ultrasound Guided Regional Anaesthesia for Breast Surgery in High Risk Patients- A Retrospective Observational Study

Vol 3 | Issue 2 | July-December 2022 | Page 93-97 | Harshal D Wagh, Shruthi Pendalya, Mandar Nadkarni

DOI: 10.13107/ijra.2022.v03i02.061


Authors: Harshal D Wagh [1], Shruthi Pendalya [1], Mandar Nadkarni [2]

[1] Department of Anaesthesia, Kokilaben Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
[2] Department of Oncosurgery, Kokilaben Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Harshal D Wagh,
Department of Anaesthesia, Kokilaben Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drhdw2701@gmail.com


Abstract

Introduction: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or breast conservative surgery (BCS) done under general anaesthesia (GA) in high-risk patients may be associated with significant morbidity, Intensive Care Unit stay and increased hospital stay leading to cost issues. In this case-series, we describe our experience with regional anesthesia for MRM or BCS and sentinel / complete axillary clearance in 61 patients with breast carcinoma who were high risk for perioperative complications in view of their co-morbidities. None required ICU or increased hospital stay postoperatively.
Material & Methods: Sixty-one ASA III/IV patients operated under regional anaesthesia for carcinoma of the breast were included. Multiple level USG guided thoracic paravertebral block (PVB), PECS block (1/2), Pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB), Serratus-anterior plane block (SAPB), brachial plexus block, Superficial cervical plexus blocks (SCPB), Erector spinae block (ESB) were given in different combinations.
Result: There were 60 female patients (Age: 30-97 years) and 1 male patient (59 years) (Left side -27 patients, right side- 34 patients). Of the total 61 patients, 23 patients underwent BCS with axillary dissection, 36 patients underwent MRM with axillary dissection, 2 patients had MRM with Pectoralis Major muscle resection. Patients received different combinations of blocks PVB or ESB, PECS1/2 and SAPB. 43 patients received the PVB, 61 got the PECS1/2, 12 patients received ESP, 32 patients required SCPB, 1 infra-clavicular block and 35 patients got PIFB. All procedures were completed under regional anaesthesia with 51 patients getting intravenous midazolam (0.01-0.02mg/kg), 59 patients were given IV fentanyl (1-3ug/kg , 43 patients were given IV propofol (1-2mg/kg), These were given in small aliquots during the duration of the procedure. 2 patients had IV ketamine (0.5mg/kg) and 1 patient had IV dexmeditomidine (0.2-0.3ug/kg/hr). IV paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) ie. Inj Diclofenac Sodium IV in the dose of 1mg/kg (max 75mg) were given when not contraindicated.
There was single case of axillary hematoma with no other complications. No patient required ICU care postoperatively and were discharged as routine.
Conclusion: A combination of blocks may be an option for surgical anaesthesia for breast surgeries in high risk patients. Careful planning, patient counseling and attention to toxic dose of local anaesthetics must always be considered.
Keywords: Paravertebral block, Thoracic wall blocks, PECS block, Serratus Anterior plane block, Pecto-intercorstal fascial block, Superficial cervical plexus, Modified radical mastectomy, Breast conservative surgery.


References


1. Ferlay J1, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. . Ann Oncol. 2007 Mar;18(3):581-92. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
2. Vadivelu N, Schreck M, Lopez J, Kodumudi G, Narayan D. Pain After Mastectomy And Breast Reconstruction. Am Surg. 2008; 74: 285-96.
3. Voight M, Frohlich Cw, WaschkeKf, Lenz C, Gobel U, Kerger H. Prophylaxis Of Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting In Elective Breast Surgery. J Clin Anaesth. 2011; 23: 461-468.
4. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Toyooka H. Prophylactic Antiemetic Therapy With Granisetron-Dexamethasone Combination In Women Undergoing Breast Surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998; 42: 1038-42.
5. Blanco R. The ‘Pecs block’: a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:847–848.
6. Pérez MF, Duany O, de la Torre PA. Redefining Pecs blocks for postmastectomy analgesia. Reg Anaesth Pain Med. 2015;40:729–730.
7. Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013; 68:1107–1113.
8. De la Torre PA, García PD, Alvarez SL, Miguel FJ, Pérez MF. A novel ultrasound-guided block: a promising alternative for breast analgesia. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34:198–200.
9. Ueshima H, Kitamura A. Blocking of multiple anterior branches of intercostal nerves (Th2–6) using a transversus thoracic muscle plane block. Reg Anaesth Pain Med. 2015;40:388.
10. Rukewe A1, Afuwape OO2, Ugheoke A3, Fatiregun AA4. Single-shot lamina thoracic paravertebral block with ketofol for modified radical mastectomy. Local Reg Anesth. 2016 Oct 6;9:83-86.
11. Sopena-Zubiria LA, Fernández-Meré LA, Valdés Arias C, Muñoz González F, Sánchez Asheras J, Ibáñez Ernández C. [Thoracic paravertebral block compared to thoracic paravertebral block plus pectoral nerve block in reconstructive breast surgery]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Jan;59(1):12-7.
12. Pawa A1, Wight J1, Onwochei DN1, Vargulescu R1, Reed I1, Chrisman L1, Pushpanathan E1, Kothari A2, El-Boghdadly K1.Combined thoracic paravertebral and pectoral nerve blocks for breast surgery under sedation: a prospective observational case series. Anaesthesia. 2018 Apr;73(4):438-443.
13. Greengrass R1, O’Brien F, Lyerly K, Hardman D, Gleason D, D’Ercole F, Steele S. Paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1996 Aug;43(8):858-61.
14. Schnabel A1, Reichl SU, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK.Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105(6):842-52.
15. Robert B. Maniker, Rebecca L. Johnson, De Q. Tran. Interfacial Plane Blocks for Breast Surgery: Which Surgery to Block, and Which Block to Choose? www.anesthesia-analgesia.org June 2020 • Volume 130 • Number 6.


How to Cite this Article: Wagh HD, Pendalya S, Nadkarni M | Ultrasound Guided Regional Anaesthesia for Breast Surgery in High Risk Patients- A Retrospective Observational Study | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | July-December 2022; 3(2): 93-97.


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)