Comments on- Time to Adequately Heed Acute Pain in the Emergency Department – More Regional Blocks Warranted

Vol 4 | Issue 1 | January-June 2023 | Page 33-34 | Arun Nagdev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.074


Authors: Arun Nagdev [1]

[1] Highland Hospital/Alameda Health System.
[2] University of California, San Francisco, USA.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Arun Nagdev,
Director, Emergency Ultrasound, Highland Hospital/Alameda Health System.
Associate Clinical Professor, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
E-mail: arunnagdev@gmail.com


To the Editor,

I read the recent article “Time to Adequately Heed Acute Pain in the Emergency Department – More Regional Blocks Warranted” by Dr. Zundert, et al. with much interest [1]. The central argument of offering adequate multimodal acute pain control to our most vulnerable patients has been the core tenant of my clinical practice and research for the last 15 years. I completely agree that If we (as the field of medicine) hope to succeed in equitable acute pain management, leveraging the skill of numerous clinicians (emergency physicians, surgeons, orthopedics, etc.) to perform single injection regional blocks will be needed [2]. Like other skills (endotracheal intubation, lumbar puncture, central venous cannulation, etc.) that have been adapted from innovators in one field and then taught to the various other specialties, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia needs to be brought from the expert regional anesthesiologists and to the clinicians who are at the bedside caring for this cohort of patients.

Working at an academic trauma center in a low resource setting, we have had to build patient-centered pain pathways that both treat acute pain as well as ensure a reduction in opioid use. With the help of our anesthesia colleague at University of California, San Francisco, we have integrated ultrasound-guided regional blocks into our clinical practice for more than 10 years in the emergency department (ED). Just as Dr. Zundert has pointed out, this collaboration between our Anesthesia and Emergency Medicine colleagues has been an amazing success, leading to timely pain control in our acutely injured patients as well as improved patient care. For hip fractures specifically, we have worked with our anesthesia and orthopedic colleagues to develop a practice standard that asks our clinicians to perform a block in under 1 hour after recognition of a hip fracture [3]. This collaborative non-siloed based practice standard between all services dealing with acutely injured patients (trauma surgery, orthopedics, anesthesia and emergency medicine) has fostered interdepartmental education, multiple research publications and most importantly improved patient care [4, 5,6, 7].

Sincerely,

Arun Nagdev, MD
Director, Emergency Ultrasound
Highland Hospital/Alameda Health System
Associate Clinical Professor
University of California, San Francisco


References


[1] Van Zundert TCRV, Van Zundert AAJ. Time to adequately heed Acute Pain in the Emergency Department – More Regional Blocks Warranted. Int J Reg Anaesth. 2022;3(2):37-41.
[2] Wroe P, O’Shea R, Johnson B, Hoffman R, Nagdev A. Ultrasound-guided forearm nerve blocks for hand blast injuries: case series and multidisciplinary protocol. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(9):1895-1897.
[3] Johnson B, Herring A, Shah S, Krosin M, Mantuani D, Nagdev A. Door-to-block time: prioritizing acute pain management for femoral fractures in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(7):801-803.
[4] Lin DY, Woodman R, Oberai T, et al. Association of anesthesia and analgesia with long-term mortality after hip fracture surgery: an analysis of the Australian and New Zealand hip fracture registry. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023;48(1):14-21.
[5] Morrison RS, Dickman E, Hwang U, et al. Regional Nerve Blocks Improve Pain and Functional Outcomes in Hip Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(12):2433-2439.
[6] Pawa A, El-Boghdadly K. Regional anesthesia by nonanesthesiologists. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(5):586-592.
[7] Stone A, Goldsmith AJ, Pozner CN, Vlassakov K. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in the emergency department: an argument for multidisciplinary collaboration to increase access while maintaining quality and standards. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(9):820-821.


How to Cite this Article: Nagdev A | Comments on- Time to Adequately Heed Acute Pain in the Emergency Department – More Regional Blocks Warranted | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | January-June 2023; 4(1): 33-34 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.074


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)


Foot Drop after Hip Surgery – An Anaesthetic Perspective

Vol 4 | Issue 1 | January-June 2023 | Page 31-32 | Vighnesh C S, Sheetal, Avneet Singh, Rajeev Kansay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.073


Authors: Vighnesh C S [1], Sheetal [1], Avneet Singh [1], Rajeev Kansay [2]

[1] Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32 Chandigarh, India.
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32 Chandigarh, India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Avneet Singh,
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College Hospital Sector 32, Chandigarh, India.
E-mail: avneetsinghch@gmail.com


To the Editor,

Foot drop is characterized by reduced muscle strength in the ankle dorsiflexors and inability to lift the forefoot. Foot drop occurring after an orthopedic procedure can occur due to various causes [1-5] (Figure 1). Epidural anaesthesia may sometimes attract undue attention in such a situation and presence of an epidural air pocket does not rule it out altogether as a cause. We describe an algorithmic approach to investigate the cause of foot drop after acetabular surgery performed under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.
A 35-year-old male, American Society of Anesthesiologists’-physical status (ASA-PS) II patient admitted with an alleged history of road-traffic accident and left acetabulum and 3rd–5th left rib fractures and hemothorax. He was initially managed for hypovolemic shock and mechanically ventilated for three days in the intensive care unit. The acetabular fracture was stabilized with tibial skeletal traction under local anesthesia. After hemodynamic stabilization, and an ICU stay duration of five days, he was planned for an acetabular fracture repair by posterior approach under combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. The preoperative evaluation and patient preparation were done as per institutional guidelines. Under aseptic precautions, combined spinal anaesthesia was applied in sitting position and midline approach at L3–L4 interspace. Epidural anaesthesia was given using 18 G Tuohy’s needle using the loss of resistance to 3 ml air at a depth of 5 cm and catheter fixed at 11 cm. The spinal anaesthesia was given with 26 G in the same lumbar space, with a clear flow of cerebrospinal fluid and 15 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine (hyperbaric) was given. The procedures were uneventful, and the patient did not report any paresthesia. The duration of surgery was 210 minutes, and 0.5% bupivacaine 5 mL was administered after 2 hours. The intraoperative period was uneventful. The postoperative analgesia was managed with epidural 0.125% bupivacaine (isobaric) with 2 μg/ml fentanyl infusion at 0.05–0.1 ml/kg/hour. On the second postoperative day, on initiating passive limb physiotherapy, the patient complained of difficulty in upward movement of ankle joint of operated limb. The clinical examination and investigations are depicted in Figure 2. A non-contrast computed tomography of the spine showed air pockets in the lumbar epidural space without hematoma (Figure 3). Initially, the epidural air pocket was considered the cause. However, this was unlikely due to the unilateral and singular peripheral nerve involvement. The diagnosis of left deep peroneal nerve injury that could have occurred due to tibial pin was made. He was initiated on limb physiotherapy and foot drop splint was applied. He was discharged with tablet diclofenac 50 mg 8th hourly and vitamin B12. On follow-up, 7 days after discharge with good physiotherapy and regular medications the patient had regained full power of dorsi-flexion.


References


[1] Carolus AE, Becker M, Cuny J, et al. The Interdisciplinary Management of Foot Drop. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2019;116: 347.
[2] Issack PS, Helfet DL. Sciatic Nerve Injury Associated with Acetabular Fractures. HSS J. 2009;5: 12.
[3] Giannoudis PV, Da Costa AA, Raman R, et al. Double-crush syndrome after acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87-B: 401–7.
[4] Liporace FA, Yoon RS, Kesani AK. Transient common peroneal nerve palsy following skeletal tibial traction in a morbidly obese patient – case report of a preventable complication. Patient Saf Surg. 2012;6:4.
[5] Ng J, Marson BA, Broodryk A. Foot drop following closed reduction of a total hip replacement. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016: bcr2016215010.


How to Cite this Article: Vighnesh CS, Sheetal, Singh A, Kansay R | Foot Drop after Hip Surgery – An Anaesthetic Perspective | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | January-June 2023; 4(1): 31-32 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.073


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)


Efficacy of Butorphanol and Tramadol as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Brachial Plexus Block – A Randomized Double-Blind Study

Vol 4 | Issue 1 | January-June 2023 | Page 07-12 | Jaya Lalwani, A. Sashank, Ravi Chaudhari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.068


Authors: Jaya Lalwani [1], A. Sashank [1], Ravi Chaudhari [1]

[1] Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Pt Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Ravi Chaudhari,
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Pt Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
E-mail: ravichaudharicc@gmail.com


Background: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block has evolved as a safe alternative to general anaesthesia with good postoperative analgesia. In an attempt to hasten the onset of block and increase the duration of postoperative analgesia, various adjuvant drugs are used along with local anesthetic agents.
Aim: The present study was undertaken to assess the analgesic efficacy of butorphanol (2mg) and tramadol (100 mg) as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block during perioperative period.
Study Design: This was a prospective, randomized, double blind study done on 100 adult patients of ASA I-III aged between 18-65 years and scheduled for various upper limb surgeries below the level of elbow.
Materials and Methodology: Patients were allocated by computer generated random draw into two groups of 50 each and were administered the study drugs under ultrasonographic guidance. Both groups received 22ml of the study drug (Group B 20 ml 0.5% levobupivacaine + Butorphanol 2mg and Group T 0.5% levobupivacaine + Tramadol 100 mg). Patients were assessed for duration of postoperative analgesia, onset & duration of sensory as well as motor blockade and occurrence of any side effects.
Results: Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly elevated in group B (683±88.58 min), as compared to group T (483.2±45.24 min.) with p<0.001. Onset of sensory and motor blockade was comparable among both groups (p>0.05). Duration of sensory and motor block in group B was significantly longer compared to group T (p<0.001). Hemodynamics were stable and side effects were minimal in both the groups.
Conclusion: Butorphanol 2mg when added to 20ml 0.5% levobupivacaine in brachial plexus block, significantly prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia, sensory and motor block as compared to addition of 100 mg tramadol, with minimal side effects and hemodynamic changes. However, these adjuvants shorten the onset times of sensory and motor block to a similar extent.
Keywords: Brachial plexus block, Levobupivacaine, Butorphanol, Tramadol, Analgesia.


References


[1] Glajchen M. Chronic pain: treatment barriers and strategies for clinical practice. J Am Board Fam Prac. 2001;14: 211-18.
[2] El-Boghdadly K, Pawa A, Chin KJ. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: current perspectives. Local Reg Anesth. 2018; 11:35-44
[3] Swain A, Nag DS, Sahu S, Samaddar DP. Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends. World J Clin Cases. 2017;5: 307-323.
[4] Bajwa SS, Kaur J. Clinical profile of levobupivacaine in regional anesthesia: A systematic review. J Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2013;29: 530-39.
[5] Howard BG, Huda A. Opioid Analgesics. In:Goodman GA, Hardman G, Lee EL, editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, Opioid analgesics. 10th ed. NewYork: McGraw Hill 2001.
[6] Vazzana M, et al. Tramadol hydrochloride: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adverse side effects, co-administration of drugs and new drug delivery systems. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015; 3586:1-5.
[7] Kumari A, Chhabra H, Gupta R, Kaur H. Comparative Study of Effectiveness of Tramadol and Butorphanol as Adjuvants to Levobupivacaine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block. Anesth Essays Res. 2019;13: 446-51.
[8] Foster RH, Markham A. Levobupivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic Drugs. 2000; 59:551–79.
[9] Edinoff A N et al. Adjuvant Drugs for Peripheral Nerve Blocks: The Role of Alpha-2 Agonists, Dexamethasone, Midazolam, and Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11: 1-10.
[10] Desai N, Kirkham KR, Albrecht E. Local anaesthetic adjuncts for peripheral regional anaesthesia: A narrative review. Anaesthesia.2021;76: 100–09.
[11] Yilmaz E, Hough KA, Gebhart GF, Williams BA, Gold MS. Mechanisms underlying midazolam-induced peripheral nerve block and neurotoxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39: 525–33.
[12] Krishna Prasad GV, Khanna S, Jaishree SV. Review of adjuvants to local anesthetics in peripheral nerve blocks: Current and future trends. Saudi J Anaesth 2020; 14:77‑84.
[13] Laudren PM. Axonal transport of opiate receptors in capsaicin-sensitive neurons. BrainResearch 1984; 68:413.
[14] Srikala V, Kumar MT. A Comparative Study of Buprenorphine Versus Butorphanol in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022; 9: 2918-24.
[15] Bhavsar GM, Shah RB, Chavda HK, Shah VD, Bateriwala KM. Use of butorphanol as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics in brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery. PIJR. 2016;5: 169–72.
[16] Vinod CN, Talikoti DG. Comparison of Butorphanol and Buprenorphine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthesia in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Post-Operative Analgesia. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2014; 3: 4287-93
[17] Khosa A.H. & Asad, Naqibullah & Durrani, HAQ DAD. Does the addition of Tramadol to local anaesthetic mixture improve the quality of axillary brachial plexus block: A comparative study at the teaching hospital, Dera Ghazi Khan. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences 2015;9: 1120-23.
[18] Bhatia U, Panjabi G, Patel A. Comparison of butorphanol and tramadol as an adjuvant to local anesthetic drug in axillary brachial plexus block. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiology 2017;10: 242-46.
[19] Sharan R, Singh M, Attri J.P, Singh D. Additive effect of butorphanol in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Int J Med Res Rev 2016;4: 910-17.
[20] Bharathi B, Praveena BL, Krishnaveni KN. Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Comparison of Varying Doses of Butorphanol Combined with Levobupivacaine – A Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Trial. Anesthesia Essays and Research. 2019;13: 174-78.
[21] Bommalingappa B, Channabasappa SM. Butorphanol as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb orthopaedic surgeries: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2016;5: 4194-97.


How to Cite this Article: Lalwani J, Sashank A, Chaudhari R | Efficacy of Butorphanol and Tramadol as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Brachial Plexus Block – A Randomized Double-Blind Study | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | July-December 2023; 4(1): 07-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.0068


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)


To Remove or Not to Remove a Broken Perineural Catheter Fragment?

Vol 4 | Issue 1 | January-June 2023 | Page 26-28 | Trupti Pethkar, Harshal Wagh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.071


Authors: Trupti Pethkar [1], Harshal Wagh [1]

[1] Department of Anaesthesia, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Trupti Pethkar,
Department of Anaesthesia, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: truptipethkar@yahoo.co.in


Fracture of femoral perineural catheter during insertion is the extremely rare complication of an otherwise low risk procedure. In such a scenario, whether to leave the catheter in situ or extract it by surgical exploration is the dilemma. We present two cases of broken femoral perineural catheter incurred during insertion. Since patients do not complain of any kind of immediate pain or discomfort, after shearing of the catheter, the decision making regarding the further management is difficult. But, there are incidences of long term complication like femoral neuritis leading to constant dragging pain. This makes us uncomfortable and force to think whether these broken fragments should left in situ.
Keywords: Femoral perineural catheter, Femoral nerve block, Fractured catheter fragment


References


[1] Joshi G, Gandhi K, Shah N, Gadsden J, Corman SL. Peripheral nerve blocks in the management of postoperative pain: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2016;35:524-9.
[2] Aveline C, Le Hetet H , Le Roux A, Vautier P, Gautier JF, Cognet F. Perineural ultrasound-guided catheter bacterial colonization: a prospective evaluation in 747 cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36:579-84.
[3] Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the published evidence. Anesth Analg 2011;113:904-25.
[4] Adam F, Jaziri S, Chauvin M. Psoas Abscess Complicating Femoral Nerve Block Catheter. Anesthesiology 2003;99:230–1.
[5] Sharma S, Iorio R, Specht LM, Davies-Lepie S, Healy WL. Complications of femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(1):135-40.
[6] Lee BH and Goucke CR. Shearing of a Peripheral Nerve Catheter. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2002;95(3):760-1.
[7] Guerci P, Novy E, Guibert J, Vial F, Malinovsky JM, Bouaziz H. Cisaillements accidentels de cathéters périnerveux lors de poses échoguidées [Inadvertent peripheral nerve catheter shearing occurring during ultrasound guidance]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013;32(5):364-7(in French).
[8] Khabiri B, Hamilton C, Norton J, Arbona F, Carlson L. The Difficulty to Remove Perineural Catheter: A Technique for Removing an Intact Catheter. Open Journal of Anesthesiology 2013;3(6):304-7.


How to Cite this Article: Pethkar T, Wagh H | To Remove or Not to Remove a Broken Perineural Catheter Fragment? | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | January-June 2023; 4(1): 26-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.071


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)


The Frail Elderly Patient and the Need for a Video Store on Regional Anaesthesia Blocks

Vol 4 | Issue 1 | January-June 2023 | Page 01-03 | André van Zundert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.066


Authors: André van Zundert [1]

[1] Australian & New Zealand College of Anaesthetists.
[2] Royal College of Anaesthetists – London UK.
[3] The University of Queensland, Australia.
[4] Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Herston Campus-Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Address of Correspondence
Professor André van Zundert,
Lennard Travers Professor of Anaesthesia – Australian & New Zealand College of Anaesthetists.
Honorary Fellow Royal College of Anaesthetists – London UK.
Professor & Chairman Discipline of Anaesthesiology, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Chair, University of Queensland Burns, Trauma & Critical Care Research Centre, Australia.
Chair, RBWH/University of Queensland Centre for Excellence & Innovation in Anaesthesia, Australia.
Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Herston Campus-Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
E-mail: vanzundertandre@gmail.com & a.vanzundert@uq.edu.au


According to The United Nations, the world’s population reached 8 billion people on 15 November 2022, a milestone in human development [1]. Life expectancy at birth has never been higher, reaching 80 years and over in several countries [2]. This is a testimony showing the triumph of humanity thanks to improvements in sanitation, the availability of clear running water and more abundant and safer foods, better housing, technology, education and better healthcare. This health transition began at different times in different world regions, but globally, life expectancy at birth doubled across all world regions and increased from an average of 29 in 1850 to 73 years in 2019 [3]. After two centuries of progress we can expect to live much more than twice as long as our ancestors. And this progress was not achieved in a few places. In every world region people today can expect to live more than twice as long. An even more important factor is the ‘estimated healthy life expectancy or HALE’, the average number of years that a person can expect to live in ‘full health’. Indeed, in modern healthcare, substantial resources are devoted to reducing the incidence, duration and severity of major diseases that cause morbidity and to reducing their impact on people’s lives.
Many elderly people enjoy a healthy lifestyle, but a significant part is frail, shows loss of physiological reserves with low functional performance, lack of physical activity, has loss of muscle mass which result in mobility issues and is affected by medical issues, e.g., multi-morbidity, multi-pharmacy use, malnutrition, loss of functional reserves, preoperative cognitive decline, depression, dementia and sensory deficits. It is known that preoperative cognitive impairment is a risk factor for the development of postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive decline. Frailty and functional impairment are strong predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes, with more medical complications, prolonged hospitalisation, institutionalisation, readmission and short-term and long-term mortality [4]. Limited mobilisation and falls usually lead to functional decline, longer hospitalisation periods, discharge to a rehabilitation facility or residential care with loss to maintain independence and increased health costs. Understanding frailty measurement, mechanisms and management is important as the prevalence of frailty may be as high as 50% and more in patients aged 85 or over [5].
This all means that anaesthesiologists will be confronted with a much larger group of elderly patients undergoing surgery. Age alone is no longer a barrier to surgery [6]. Anaesthesiologists need to assess the patient’s body capacity to cope with stress of illness of surgery and the factors which contribute to poor outcomes. Anaesthesiologists can reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality to adequately control pain, correct inadequate nutrition and hydration, provide thromboprophylaxis and is alert for sepsis and delirium. The anaesthesiologist needs to understand the impact of changing physiology, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the ageing process and aims to maintain homeostasis in the presence of surgical stress and actions of anaesthetic drugs. A tailored anaesthetic optimum management plan adjusted to the elderly patient’s condition focuses on taking care of pain, delirium, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, poor nutrition and hydration and rehabilitation planning. Risk factors for the development of postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive decline include pre-existing cognitive impairment, sleep deprivation, immobility, visual and hearing impairments, dehydration, and the use of sedative-, hypnotic, and anticholinergic medication. Optimum management includes recognition and prevention of infections, effective knowledge about antibiotic prophylaxis, thromboembolic prophylaxis, the use of compression stockings, attention to the needs of nutritional and hydration requirements, early mobilisation and rehabilitation planning well before and after surgery.
It is known that prolonged and aggressive surgery under general anaesthesia may result in postoperative delirium and cognitive decline due to neuroinflammation, but also extended length of hospital stay and increased morbidity and mortality, especially in the frail elderly group. George et al. [7] recently demonstrated in a cohort study of over 2.7 million frail elderly patients, the 180-day mortality rates for very frail patients across nine noncardiac surgical specialties were greater than 25%. Frail patients in all specialty categories had 15% to 18% mortality following higher stress procedures and 7% to 17% mortality after procedures causing less stress. These findings suggest that there is no such thing as a low-risk procedure for frail patients.
Among the anaesthetic techniques, four main classes are available: general anaesthesia, sedation, loco-regional anaesthesia (central neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks) and local anaesthesia. The use of local anaesthesia in the frail population has increased tremendously over the last 10 years [5]. The main reasons for its popular use are that it is a simple, low cost, reproducible technique requiring no premedication, avoiding the side effects and complications of sedation and general anaesthesia. The application of regional anaesthesia leads to early recovery without perioperative hypothermia or hypotension and a reduction in airway and pulmonary complications, proinflammatory reaction and delirium. However, it is not a panacea that can be applied in every situation. Not every surgical intervention lends itself to perform under regional anaesthesia or local anaesthesia, i.e., major cardiac, neuro or intra-abdominal surgery. It requires patient cooperation, and the patient needs to know there may be periods of intraoperative discomfort, while in certain circumstances it is not even possible to do the operation under regional anaesthesia, e.g., in an anticoagulated patient or when there is (local) sepsis. Anaesthesiologists need to be aware of potential side effects and toxicity of local anaesthetics or their adjuncts (e.g., epinephrine in a cardiac compromised patient), especially in the frail population, and have all the precautions ready at hand in case of a local anaesthetic systemic toxic reaction [5].
Regional anaesthesia needs to be educated. It cannot be learnt from books alone. Workshops and education on manikins are helpful, but limitations are known. But how best to learn new techniques? Major illustrated textbooks offer a large range of regional anaesthesia techniques but lack the interaction. The best practice is obtained during teaching on patients in the presence of a qualified mentor, allowing discussion how to improve specific techniques and how to adjust these blocks to the frail surgical population. This is not only helpful for junior doctors, but also experienced anaesthesiologists can learn from each other.
The last decade saw a dramatical advance in regional anaesthesia techniques, benefitting from new blocks, medications, medical equipment and the application of ultrasonography and its decreasing impact on serious problems, while boosting efficacy and practicality of the blocks [8]. The last five years saw an increased annual research production on topics in regional anaesthesia. This is partly due to the trend toward less invasive surgical procedures, and the application of anaesthetic solutions that reduce systemic opioid doses, allowing same-day discharge to become more popular.
Specialized journals such as the International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia (IJRA) can substantially help in providing extra knowledge, updated to the latest standards, focusing on all kinds of regional block techniques. Scientific articles on these blocks are helpful, but video presentations of the blocks will be even more appreciated. A collection of video-recorded regional anaesthesia blocks in a new video store of the journal, providing a structured approach, with clear details of the anatomy, graphs and visual illustrations of each block, including guiding how to do the block (technical aspects) and what kind of local anaesthetic solution to use, should be provided. Clear instructions about dosing (dose, volume and concentration of the local anaesthetics and their additives) based on the individual (frail) patient; positioning of the patient; use of sedatives or not during a regional block; how to avoid wrong-side/site blocks; how to evaluate the resulting block and when to allow surgery to start; when and what to monitor during the block and during surgery; what and how to distract the patient during surgery (headphone with preferred music); are just a few of the numerous aspects of information these videos can provide.
This video teaching platform should rank videos from easy basic practice (*) to intermediate (**) and advanced (***) practice. The videos can be used during workshop discussions in a group as the instructor can focus on particular aspects of importance.
This video-store of IJRA should be built up in the coming years and made available free of access as this will help in distributing knowledge that all of us can use to provide better healthcare and safe and effective anaesthesia to our patients, especially to the frail elderly ones. The quality and quantity of these videos on regional anaesthesia techniques depend on the collaboration and willingness of our colleagues to produce high-quality video material. The journal could provide a format of what constitutes the basic information that needs to accompany any of these regional anaesthesia techniques. As such, IJRA could prove to become a major player in regional anaesthesia education.
Anaesthesiologists aim to care to a whole range of patients, young and old, healthy and frail, undergoing surgery by various specialists. Ageing is heterogenous, variable and malleable.9 Age as the passing of chronological time, is not synonymous with ageing, i.e., the increased risk of adverse outcomes over time. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is the fundamental diagnostic and management instrument, enabling us to understand that each individual has a unique profile of health status. Quantification of frailty is just the beginning of risk stratification. Clinicians can then guide their patients and caregivers through a shared decision-making process. Often, regional anaesthesia can provide the best choice for people at age, especially for the frail older people. We, as anaesthesiologists, need to be ready to provide high-standard regional anaesthesia blocks to all patient categories, whether they are young or old, healthy or frail.


References


[1] https://www.un.org/en/dayof8billion (accessed 02.01.2023)
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy (accessed 02.01.2023).
[3] https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy (accessed 02.01.2023).
[4] Lin HS, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2016 Aug 31;16(1):157.
[5] Cutfield G. Anaesthesia and perioperative card for elderly surgical patients. Aus Prescr 2002;25:42-44.
[6]] George EL, Hall DE, Youk A, et al. Association Between Patient Frailty and Postoperative Mortality Across Multiple Noncardiac Surgical Specialties. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(1):e205152.
[7] Cuvillon P, Lefrant JY, Gricourt Y. Considerations for the Use of Local Anesthesia in the Frail Elderly: Current Perspectives. Local Reg Anesth. 2022 Aug 10;15:71-75.
[8] Shbeer A. Regional Anesthesia (2012-2021): A Comprehensive Examination Based on Bibliometric Analyses of Hotpots, Knowledge Structure and Intellectual Dynamics. J Pain Res. 2022 Aug 15;15:2337-2350.
[9] Gordon EH, Hubbard RE. Frailty: understanding the difference between age and ageing. Age Ageing. 2022 Aug 2;51(8):afac185.


How to Cite this Article: Van Zundert A | The Frail Elderly Patient and the Need for a Video Store on Regional Anaesthesia Blocks | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | January-June 2023; 4(1): 01-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.066


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)


Comparative Evaluation of Varying Volumes of Local Anaesthetic Solution in Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) on Dynamic Pain Relief after Hip Surgeries

Vol 4 | Issue 1 | January-June 2023 | Page 20-25 | Megha Sood, Richa Jain, Gurpreeti Kaur, Amol Rattan, Mirley Rupinder Kaur, Rajnish Garg, Anju Grewal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.070


Authors: Megha Sood [1], Richa Jain [1], Gurpreeti Kaur [1], Amol Rattan [2], Mirley Rupinder Kaur [1], Rajnish Garg [1], Anju Grewal [1]

[1] Department of Anaesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Richa Jain,
Department of Anaesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
E-mail: richajain2105@gmail.com


Background: The peri-capsular nerve group block (PENG) has reported the ability to decrease pain in hip fractures and minimize the use of opioids for postoperative analgesia. We conducted this trial to assess the efficacy of varying volumes of local anesthetic solution in PENG block in alleviating post-operative pain at rest and on dynamic hip movement after hip surgeries.
Material & Methods: A prospective, double-blinded interventional trial was conducted on 70 adult ASA I-III patients undergoing hip surgeries under general anesthesia. Enrolled subjects were divided into two groups A and B to receive either 10ml of 0.2% ropivacaine or 20ml of 0.2% ropivacaine respectively in an ultrasound-guided (USG) PENG block after administration of general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. VAS scores (at rest and on dynamic hip movement), the cumulative amount of rescue analgesic needed in the 24-hour post-operative period and patient satisfaction scores were secondary outcomes. Data thus collected were statistically analyzed.
Results: Mean duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group B (12.24±5.14 hours) as compared to group A (2.77±1.06 hours). There were statistically significant decreased VAS scores at rest and on dynamic hip movement in group B. Median total rescue analgesic consumption in 24 hours and patient satisfaction score was significantly reduced in group B than in group A (p=0.001).
Conclusion: In PENG block, 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine provides a significantly longer duration of analgesia, a statistically significant reduction in pain scores on rest and dynamic hip movement with substantially decreased 24-hour total rescue analgesic consumption, and improved patient satisfaction in patients undergoing hip surgeries.
Keywords: Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG), Hip surgeries, Ropivacaine, Visual analogue scale (VAS)


References


[1] Girón-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med.2018;43:859-63.
[2] Morrison C, Brown B, Lin DY, Jaarsma R, Kroon H. Analgesia and anesthesia using the pericapsular nerve group block in hip surgery and hip fracture: a scoping review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46:169-75.
[3] Guay J, Johnson RL, Kopp S. Nerve blocks or no nerve blocks for pain control after elective hip replace- ment (arthroplasty) surgery in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;10:CD011608.
[4] Mistry T, Sonawane KB, Kuppusamy E. PENG block: points to ponder. Reg Anesth Pain Med.2019;44:423.2–4.
[5] Roy R, Agarwal G, Pradhan C, Kuanar D. Total postoperative analgesia for hip surgeries, PENG block with LFCN block. Reg Anesth Pain Med.2019;44:684.
[6] Rocha Romero A, Carvajal Valdy G, Lemus AJ. Ultrasound- Guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) hip joint phenol neurolysis for palliative pain. J Can Anesth.2019;66:1270–1.
[7] Ueshima H, Otake H. Clinical experiences of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for hip surgery. J ClinAnesth.2018;51:60–1.
[8] Acharya U, Lamsal R. Pericapsular nerve group block: an excellent option for analgesia for positional pain in hip fractures. Case Rep Anesthesiol.2020;2020:1830136.
[9] Subedi M, Bajaj S, Kumar M, MayurYC. An overview of tramadol and its usage in pain management and future perspective. BiomedPharmacother. 2019;111:443-451.
[10] De Cosmo G, Congedo E. The use of NSAIDs in the postoperative period: advantage and disadvantages. J AnesthCrit Care. 2015;4:1-10.
[11] Scottish intercollegiate Guidelines network. Management of hip fractures in older people: National Clinical Guidelines; 2009. (https://pdf4pro.com/cdn/part-of-nhs-quality-improvement-scotland-2531e4.pdf)
[12] Kuthiala G, Chaudhary G. Ropivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and clinical use. Indian J Anaesth.2011;55:104-10.
[13] Kukreja P, Avila A, Northern T, Dangle J, Kolli S, Kalagara H. A Retrospective Case Series of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Primary Versus Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Analgesia. Cureus. 2020;12:e8200.
[14] Morrison C, Brown B, Lin DY, Jaarsma R, Kroon H. Analgesia and anesthesia using the pericapsular nerve group block in hip surgery and hip fracture: a scoping review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46:169-75.
[15] Mysore K, Sancheti SA, Howells SR, Ballah EE, Sutton JL, Uppal V. Postoperative analgesia with pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67:1673-4.
[16] Pascarella G, Costa F, Del Buono R, Pulitanò R, Strumia A, Piliego C, et al. Impact of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, observer-masked, controlled trial. Anaesthesia.2021;76:1492-8.
[17] Lin DY, Morrison C, Brown B, Saies AA, Pawar R, Vermeulen M, et al. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides improved short-term analgesia compared with the femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med.2021;46:398-403.
[18] Nielsen MV, Nielsen TD, Bendtsen TF, Børglum J. The Shamrock sign: comprehending the trefoil may refine block execution. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2018;84:1423–5.


How to Cite this Article: Sood M, Jain R, Kaur G, Rattan A, Kaur MR, Garg R, Grewal A | Comparative Evaluation of Varying Volumes of Local Anaesthetic Solution in Pericapsular Nerve Group Block(PENG) on Dynamic Pain Relief after Hip Surgeries | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | January-June 2023; 4(1): 20-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.070


(Abstract Text HTML)    (Download PDF)