Converting Regional Anaesthesia Database into Publication: A Step-based Approach
Vol 4 | Issue 1 | January-June 2023 | Page 04-06 | Mayank Gupta, Gopal Jalwal, Anju Grewal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.067
Authors: Mayank Gupta [1], Gopal Jalwal [1], Anju Grewal [1]
[1] Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, AIIMS, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Gopal Jalwal,
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, AIIMS, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
E-mail: gopaljalwal@gmail.com
Abstract
The article discusses the benefits of regional anaesthesia (RA) and the role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in enhancing its safety and efficacy. Conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish the efficacy of RA remains a challenge due to resource constraints and ethical considerations. The author suggests that focusing solely on RCTs can be counterproductive and advocates for the importance of other forms of research, such as case series, practice audits, and prospective observational cohort studies. These forms of research can provide a background and rationale for designing future RCTs and can help broaden the scope of research beyond the idealistic RCT paradigm. The passage also includes a table highlighting the pros and cons of different study designs. Overall, the article emphasizes the importance of expanding the scope of research to improve the safety and efficacy of RA.
Keywords: Regional anaesthesia, Point-of-care ultrasound, Randomized controlled trials, Case series, Practice audits, Prospective observational cohort studies, Efficacy, Safety
References
[1] Hutton M, Brull R, Macfarlane AJR. Regional anaesthesia and outcomes. BJA Educ. 2018 Feb;18(2):52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
[2] Chin KJ, Mariano E, El-Boghdadly KE. Advancing towards the next frontier in regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2021; 76(S1): 3–7.
[3] Shelley BG, Anderson KJ, Macfarlane AJR. Regional anaesthesia for thoracic surgery: what is the PROSPECT that fascial plane blocks are the answer? Anaesthesia 2022; 77(3): 252–256.
[4] Kearns RJ, Womack J, Macfarlane AJ. Regional anaesthesia research – where to now? Br J Pain. 2022 Apr;16(2):132-135. doi: 10.1177/20494637221091139.
[5] Dohlman LE, Kwikiriza A, Ehie O. Benefits and Barriers to Increasing Regional Anesthesia in Resource-Limited Settings. Local Reg Anesth. 2020 Oct 22;13:147-158. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S236550.
[6] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
[7] Carey TS, Boden SD. A critical guide to case series reports. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15):1631-4. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083174.84050.E5.
[8] Kayir S, Kisa A. The evolution of the regional anesthesia: a holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis between 1980-2019. Korean J Pain. 2021 Jan 1;34(1):82-93. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.1.82.
[9] New journals for publishing medical case reports. Akers KG. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104:146–149.
[10] Sayre JW, Toklu HZ, Ye F, Mazza J, Yale S. Case Reports, Case Series – From Clinical Practice to Evidence-Based Medicine in Graduate Medical Education. Cureus. 2017 Aug 7;9(8):e1546. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1546.
[11] Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D; CARE Group*. The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013 Sep;2(5):38-43. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.008.
[12] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
[13] Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, Chan AW, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, Terwee CB, Chee-A-Tow A, Baba A, Gavin F, Grimshaw JM, Kelly LE, Saeed L, Thabane L, Askie L, Smith M, Farid-Kapadia M, Williamson PR, Szatmari P, Tugwell P, Golub RM, Monga S, Vohra S, Marlin S, Ungar WJ, Offringa M. Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension. JAMA. 2022;328(22):2252-2264.
[14] Sayre JW, Toklu HZ, Ye F, Mazza J, Yale S. Case Reports, Case Series – From Clinical Practice to Evidence-Based Medicine in Graduate Medical Education. Cureus. 2017 Aug 7;9(8):e1546. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1546.
| How to Cite this Article: Gupta M, Jalwal G, Grewal A | Converting Regional Anaesthesia database into Publication: A step-based approach | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | January-June 2023; 4(1): 04-06 | DOI:https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.067 |
(Abstract Text HTML) (Download PDF)
Prospective Comparative Double-Blind Study on Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Traumatic Hip Surgeries
Vol 4 | Issue 1 | January-June 2023 | Page 13-19 | Chetana Bhalerao, Ujjwalraj Dudhedia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.069
Authors: Chetana Bhalerao [1], Ujjwalraj Dudhedia [1]
[1] Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. L.H. Hiranandani Hospital Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Chetana Vitthal Bhalerao,
Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. L.H. Hiranandani Hospital Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: chetana.bhalerao999@gmail.com
Abstract
Background: Severe pain in hip fractures limits ideal positioning for spinal anaesthesia. We evaluated the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFI) for positioning and postoperative pain relief in hip surgeries.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study including 30 patients aged 30-90 years of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists’-physical status score I to II undergoing traumatic hip surgeries were divided into two groups. Each group was administered 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% + 10 ml lignocaine 1%. Vitals and visual analogue scale (VAS) score pre-block, 10 mins post-block, after shifting to operation theatre and after positioning; at rest, and after straight leg raise (SLR) and quadriceps muscle strength were noted. The remaining aspects of perioperative care, including subarachnoid block and rescue analgesic techniques were standardized. Time to request first rescue analgesia, duration of block, and incidence of nausea was noted. Statistical analysis done using the Student t test, Chi-Square test.
Results: VAS scores in both groups 10 mins post block at rest, after SLR, and after positioning were comparable. The drop in VAS score although statistically insignificant was more in the PENG group. The motor blockade in SIFI was significantly higher compared to the PENG group (p-0.002). Duration of analgesia with SIFI 551.9 (±56.2) min was longer than PENG block 400.4 (±62.8) min (p=0.0005%). No significant difference between the groups to demographics, hemodynamic parameters, rescue analgesia and incidence of nausea.
Conclusion: PENG block provides superior and faster analgesia with potentially motor sparing effect compared to SIFI block whereas SIFI provides longer duration of analgesia.
Keywords: Analgesia, Pain, Regional Anaesthesia, Ultrasonography
References
[1] Shteynberg A, Riina LH, Glickman LT, Meringolo JN, Simpson RL. Ultrasound guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block: safe and simple anesthesia for harvesting skin grafts. Burns. 2013;39: 146-9.
[2] Martins RS, M G Siqueira, Silva FC Jr, Heise CO, Teixeira MJ. A practical approach to the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh: an anatomical study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011; 113:868-71.
[3] Aszmann OC, Dellon ES, Dellon AL. Anatomical course of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and its susceptibility to compression and injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100: 600-4.
[4] Benezis I, Boutaud B, Leclerc J, Fabre T, Durandeau A. Lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy and its surgical treatment: a report of 167 cases. Muscle Nerve. 2007;36: 659-63.
[5] Marhofer P, Nasel C, Sitzwohl C, Kapral S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the distribution of local anesthetic during the three-in-one block. Anesth Analg. 2000;90: 119-24.
[6] Swenson JD, Davis JJ, Stream JO, Crim JR, Burks RT, Greis PE. Local anesthetic injection deep to the fascia iliaca at the level of the inguinal ligament: the pattern of distribution and effects on the obturator nerve. J Clin Anesth. 2015;27: 652-7.
[7] Steenberg J, Møller AM. Systematic review of the effects of fascia iliaca compartment block on hip fracture patients before operation. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120: 1368-1380.
[8] Ueshima H, Otake H. Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block under ultrasound guidance for perioperative analgesia during bipolar hip arthroplasty in a patient with severe
cardiovascular compromise: A case report. Medicine. 2018; 97(40).
[9] Short AJ, Barnett JJG, Gofeld M, Baig E, Lam K, Agur AMR, Peng PWH. Anatomic Study of Innervation of the Anterior Hip Capsule: Implication for Image-Guided Intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43: 186-192.
[10] Girón-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43: 859-63.
[11] White S, Stott P. Fascia iliaca block for primary hip arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2017;72 :409.
[12] K Shankar, Srinivasan Rangalakshmi, AB Ashwin, et al. Comparative Study of Ultrasound Guided PENG [Pericapsular Nerve Group] Block and FIB [Fascia Iliaca Block] for Positioning and Postoperative Analgesia Prior to Spinal Anaesthesia for Hip Surgeries: Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study. Indian J Anesth Analg.2020;7: 798-803.
[13] Jadon A, Mohsin K, Sahoo RK, Chakraborty S, Sinha N, Bakshi A. Comparison of supra-inguinal fascia iliaca versus pericapsular nerve block for ease of positioning during spinal anaesthesia: A randomised double-blinded trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65: 572-578.
[14]Bhattacharya A, Bhatti T, Haldar M. ESRA19-0539 Pericapsular nerve group block–is it better than the rest for pain relief in fracture neck of femur? Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2019; 44(Suppl 1): A116.
[15] Vermeylen K, Desmet M, Leunen I, Soetens F, Neyrinck A, Carens Det al. Supra-inguinal injection for fascia iliaca compartment block results in more consistent spread towards the lumbar plexus than an infra-inguinal injection: a volunteer study. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2019;44: 483-91.
[16] Gasanova I, Alexander JC, Estrera K, Wells J, Sunna M, Minhajuddin A, Joshi GP. Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block versus periarticular infiltration for pain management after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44: 206-211.
[17] Ridderikhof ML, De Kruif E, Stevens MF, Baumann HM, Lirk PB, Goslings JC, Hollmann MW. Ultrasound guided supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blocks in hip fracture patients: An alternative technique. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38: 231-236.
[18] Bali C, Ozmete O. Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block in older-old patients for hip fractures: a retrospective study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021: S0104-0014(21)00336-5.
[19] Yamada K, Inomata S, Saito S. Minimum effective volume of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 21859.
[20] Aydin ME, Borulu F, Ates I, Kara S, Ahiskalioglu A. A Novel Indication of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block: Surgical Anesthesia for Vein Ligation and Stripping. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34: 843-845.
| How to Cite this Article: Bhalerao C, Dudhedia U | Prospective Comparative Double-Blind Study on Ultrasound- Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Traumatic Hip Surgeries | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | January-June 2023; 4(1): 13-19 | DOI:https://doi.org/10.13107/ijra.2023.v04i01.069 |
(Abstract Text HTML) (Download PDF)
Efficacy of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Hip Arthroplasty Patients– A Prospective Case Series
Vol 3 | Issue 2 | July-December 2022 | Page 98-101 | Bharati A. Adhye, Sandeep M. Diwan, Rajeev Joshi, Parag K. Sancheti
DOI: 10.13107/ijra.2022.v03i02.062
Authors: Bharati A. Adhye [1], Sandeep M. Diwan [1], Rajeev Joshi [1], Parag K. Sancheti [2]
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, Sancheti Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, Sancheti Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Bharati A. Adhye,
Chief Anaesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesiology, Sancheti Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: bharatiadhye@gmail.com
Abstract
The Thoracic Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been incorporated in multimodal analgesia protocols since 2016. In a series of 20 Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) patients, done under spinal anaesthesia, we studied the efficacy of Lumbar Erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) for post operative analgesia. L-ESPB was administered at L4 with Ropivacaine 0.2% (0.4 mg/kg). Time to first analgesia (TTFA) request (mean 15.03 hours) and total opioid consumption in first 24 hours (mean 27.5 mg Tramadol) was noted. A median NRS at TTFA was 3.5. Our study demonstrates L-ESPB as an effective alternate technique for postoperative analgesia in THA patients.
Keywords: Lumber ESP block, Hip Arthroplasty
References
1. Singh R, Bajaj JK, Singh D. Comparison of psoas compartment block and epidural block for postoperative analgesia in hip surgeries. Astrocyte 2018;4(4):221.
2. Capdevila X, Macaire P, Dadure C, Choquet O, Biboulet P, Ryckwaert Y, et al. Continuous psoas compartment block for postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: new landmarks, technical guidelines, and clinical evaluation. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(6):1606-1613.
3. Grant CR, Checketts MR. Analgesia for primary hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of regional anaesthesia. Contin Educ Anaesthesia, Crit Care Pain. 2008;8(2):56-61.
4. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621-627.
5. Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019;53:29-34.
6. Chin KJ, Adhikary S Das, Forero M. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A new paradigm in regional anesthesia and analgesia. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2019;9(3):271-280.
7. Tulgar S, Ermis MN, Ozer Z. Combination of lumbar erector spinae plane block and transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for surgical anaesthesia in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(10):802.
8. Tulgar S, Senturk O. Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block at L-4 transverse process level provides effective postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Anesth. 2017;44:68.
9. Ahiskalioglu A, Tulgar S, Celik M, Ozer Z, Alici HA, Aydin ME. Lumbar erector spinae plane block as a main anesthetic method for hip surgery in high risk elderly patients: initial experience with a magnetic resonance imaging. Eurasian J Med. 2020;52(1):16.
10. Tulgar S, Aydin ME, Ahiskalioglu A, De Cassai A, Gurkan Y. Anesthetic techniques: focus on lumbar erector spinae plane block. Local Reg Anesth. 2020;13:121.
11. González SJDL, Pomés J, Prats-Galino A, Gracia J, Martínez-Camacho A, SalaBlanch X. Estudio anatómico de la distribución del volumen administrado tras bloqueo en el plano profundo del erector espinal a nivel lumbar. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2019;66(8):409-416.
12. R. Shane T, Matthew R, Levin B.S., Marios Loukas, Eric A. Potts, Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol. Anatomy and landmarks for the superior and middle cluneal nerves: application to posterior iliac crest harvest and entrapment syndromes. J. Neurosurg: Spine/ Volume13/ September 2010
13. Diwan S, Nair A. Lumbar erector spinae plane block obtunding knee and ankle reflexes. Saudi J Anaesth. 2021;15(2):222.
| How to Cite this Article: Adhye BA, Diwan SM, Joshi R, Sancheti PK | Efficacy of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Hip Arthroplasty Patients– A Prospective Case Series | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | July-December 2022; 3(2): 98-101. |
(Abstract Text HTML) (Download PDF)
Ischiorectal Abscess Under Bilateral Pudendal Nerve Block for Perioperative Analgesia in a Patient with Severe Ischaemic Heart Disease- A Case Report
Vol 3 | Issue 2 | July-December 2022 | Page 102-104 | Kartik Sonawane, Jagannathan Balavenkatasubramanian
DOI: 10.13107/ijra.2022.v03i02.063
Authors: Nitin Gawai [1], Sandeep Diwan [1], Abhishek Lonikar [1], Ganesh Bhong [1], Parag Sancheti [2]
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, Sancheti Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, Sancheti Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Nitin Gawai,
Department of Anesthesiology, Sancheti Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
E-mail: drnitingawai@yahoo.com
Abstract
Anorectal abscess, an infection in the anal area is a potentially debilitating and painful condition requiring urgent drainage to prevent septicemia. Commonly performed under neuraxial anaesthesia, we report surgical drainage of bilateral ischiorectal abscess under bilateral pudendal nerve blocks and general anaesthesia in a patient with severe ischaemic heart disease. Through our case we add to the existing literature, the importance of administrating peripheral nerve block in highly co-morbid patients.
Keywords: Anorectal abscess, Bilateral pudendal block, Severe ischaemic heart disease.
References
1. Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL, Rafferty JL, Buie WD; Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(12):1465-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823122b3 [ Links ]
2. Chahal HS, Garg K, Bose A, Kaur S. Anorectal Surgeries under Local Anaesthesia: A Single Center Experience. MGM J Med Sci 2017;4(2):75-7
3. Hedge J, Balajibabu PR, Sivaraman T. The patient with ischaemic heart disease undergoing non cardiac surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61(9):705-711. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_384_17.
4. Narouze S, Benzon HT, Provenzano D, Buvanendran A, De Andres J, Deer T, Rauck R, Huntoon MA. Interventional Spine and Pain Procedures in Patients on Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Medications (Second Edition): Guidelines From the American Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the International Neuromodulation Society, the North American Neuromodulation Society, and the World Institute of Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Apr;43(3):225-262. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000700. PMID: 29278603.
5. Gruber H, Kovacs P, Piegger J, Brenner E. New, simple, ultrasound-guided infiltration of the pudendal nerve: topographic basics. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1376–1380.
6. Bellingham GA, Bhatia A, Chan CW, Peng PW. Randomized controlled trial comparing pudendal nerve block under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:262–266.
| How to Cite this Article: Gawai N, Diwan S, Lonikar A, Bhong G, Sancheti P | Ischiorectal Abscess Under Bilateral Pudendal Nerve Block for Perioperative Analgesia in a Patient with Severe Ischaemic Heart Disease- A Case Report | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | July-December 2022; 3(2): 102-104. |
(Abstract Text HTML) (Download PDF)
Landmark Guided Lower Interscalene Block as a Rescue Approach in a Case of Elusive Supraclavicular Block for Elbow Surgery
Vol 3 | Issue 2 | July-December 2022 | Page 105-106 | Pratibha Jain, A. Sashank, Divyanand Mishra
DOI: 10.13107/ijra.2022.v03i02.064
Authors: Pratibha Jain [1], A. Sashank [1], Divyanand Mishra [1]
[1] Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Divyanand Mishra,
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
E-mail: itsdnmishra09@gmail.com
Letter to Editor
Dear Editor,
Our case was an 18 yrs/m, weighing 54 kg without co morbidities presented with pain in right elbow and was posted for screw fixation of fracture capitulum. His routine blood work and airway examination were normal to undergo the surgery under supraclavicular block (SCB). On arrival, patient’s PR was 84/min, BP- 118/72 mm Hg, SpO2- 98% on room air.
For right sided SCB, patient was placed supine, head turned to left side with shoulder depressed and needle was inserted lateral to subclavian artery pulsation just above the clavicle, posterolaterally. There was inadvertent puncture of subclavian artery each time, despite using standard techniques. Hence we decided to abandon standard SCB and proceed with lower interscalene block (LISB).Using modified Winnie’s approach interscalene groove was palpated and needle was inserted 2-3 cm below the classical interscalene block (ISB) site. Paresthesia was attained over whole upper limb and then Inj. Lignocaine + Adrenaline (2%) 10 ml along with inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 10 ml was injected after repeated negative aspirations. A satisfactory sensory and motor blockade was obtained after 15 minutes of injection. Throughout the procedure, patient was continuously monitored and surgery was completed within 1.5h without any adverse event. The patient was shifted to ward. The block weaned off in 6 hrs and his vitals were stable throughout his course of stay in the hospital.
Traditionally, the subclavian artery is an important relation of the brachial plexus for landmark guided SCB. However, anatomical variation may be present in as much as 50% of the population. [1] T1 nerve root supplies skin both above and below the elbow. Some authors have suggested a combined ISB + axillary block to get profound anaesthesia for elbow surgery. [2,3] Axillary nerve block was not contemplated in our case as optimal arm positioning was precluded due to severe pain at elbow. The advantages of LISB over SCB and ISB or ISB + axillary block are that it significantly reduces the risk of pneumothorax , inadvertent arterial puncture, ulnar sparing (as lower trunks of brachial plexus are more superficial in LISB) and avoids multiple injections. LISB also provides adequate anaesthesia and analgesia to whole upper limb which could be due to the relative proximity of the inferior trunks to the other components of brachial plexus as they become tightly bundled between the clavicle and first rib at this level.[2] Performing an LISB is easier due to its accessibility and shallow location of the brachial plexus, which may be favourable to those who disfavour or may not be comfortable with the supraclavicular approach. [4]
Our case exemplifies that in those centres where ultrasound machine is unavailable and access to the brachial plexus for SCB by landmark technique remains elusive despite troubleshooting, lower interscalene block can be safely used to provide similar quality and extent of surgical anaesthesia.
References
1. Uysal I, Sekar M, Karabulut AK, Buyukmumcu M, Ziylan T. Brachial plexus variations in human foetuses. Neurosurgery 2003;53(3):676-684.
2. Gadsden JC, Tsai T, Iwata T, Somsundarum L, Robards C, Hadzic A. Low interscalene block provides reliable anesthesia for surgery at or about the elbow. Journal of Clinical Anesth 2009;21:98-102.
3. Faryniarz D, Morelli C, Coleman S, et al. Interscalene block anesthesia at an ambulatory surgery center performing predominantly regional anesthesia: a prospective study of one hundred thirty-three patients undergoing shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006;15:686-90.
4. Brown AR, Parker GC. The use of a reverse axis (axillary interscalene) block in a patient presenting with fractures of the left shoulder and elbow. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1618-20.
| How to Cite this Article: Jain P, Sashank A, Mishra D | Landmark Guided Lower Interscalene Block as a Rescue Approach in a Case of Elusive Supraclavicular Block for Elbow Surgery | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | July-December 2022; 3(2): 105-106. |
(Abstract Text HTML) (Download PDF)
Modified Clavipectoral Fascial Plane Block to The Rescue: Polytrauma Patient with Brachial Plexus Injury Undergoing Awake Clavicle Surgery
Vol 3 | Issue 2 | July-December 2022 | Page 107-109 | Chetana V Bhalerao, Tuhin Mistry, Stephan Jebaraj, Jagannathan Balavenkatasubramanian
DOI: 10.13107/ijra.2022.v03i02.065
Authors: Chetana V Bhalerao [1], Tuhin Mistry [1], Stephan Jebaraj [1], Jagannathan Balavenkatasubramanian [1]
[1] Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Tuhin Mistry,
Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: tm.tuhin87@gmail.com
Letter to Editor
Dear Editor,
Clavipectoral fascial plane block (CFPB) is an attractive alternative to traditional regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques for clavicle surgery. It was reported to provide motor-sparing, diaphragm-sparing stand-alone surgical anaesthesia, or perioperative analgesia [1]. We want to highlight the application of CFPB as the sole RA technique in a polytrauma patient with brachial plexus injury for surgical management of clavicle fracture. Consent was obtained for the publication of this letter.
A 30-year-old American Society of Anesthesiologist physical grade I male (weight 75 kg, height 170 cm) patient was admitted with an alleged history of a fall from a two-wheeler. He had displaced comminuted right clavicle fracture (Allman type I) (Figure 1a), displaced fracture of right transverse processes of C6-T1, and right brachial plexus injury. He had undergone emergency left fronto-temporo-parietal craniotomy and evacuation of an acute subdural hematoma under general anaesthesia. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit following surgery and weaned off from ventilatory support after three days. A Follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a significant reduction of cerebral edema and a thin rim of residual left frontal, bilateral tentorial, and interhemispheric subdural hematoma. Magnetic resonance imaging of the right brachial plexus revealed C5-C8 complete nerve root avulsion with hematoma and soft tissue edema in the adjacent area. After ten days of craniotomy, the patient was scheduled for right clavicle open reduction and internal fixation with plating (Figure 1b). The plan was to provide motor-sparing, phrenic nerve-sparing surgical anaesthesia without brachial plexus block (BPB). The anaesthesia plan was explained to the patient and relatives, and informed written high-risk consent was obtained.
Standard monitors were attached inside the operating room, and an infusion of ringer lactate was started. Oxygen supplementation using a Hudson mask at 5 L/min flow was provided. The patient was placed supine with the head turned towards the contralateral side. Ultrasound-guided modified right CFPB was performed as described by Sonawane et al.[2] A high-frequency linear probe (Sonosite HFL 38xp/13–6 MHz; Fujifilm SonoSite Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) was placed on the skin over the anterior surface of the clavicle. The local anesthetic (LA) was deposited on the medial (10 ml) and lateral (10 ml) third of the clavicle between the clavipectoral fascia and periosteal collar using an in-plane technique (Figure 1c,d). In addition, the probe was kept over the fracture site, and LA (5 ml) was deposited around it under vision. Also, the skin over the incision site was covered by an additional subcutaneous infiltration (5 ml). The total volume of the LA was 30 ml (1:1 of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 1% Lignocaine-adrenaline, 8 mg Dexamethasone). The patient’s vitals remained stable, and the procedure was completed without complications.
Clavicle innervation is complex and controversial. The pain-generating elements in clavicle surgeries include the skin and the richly innervated periosteum. The brachial plexus roots involved in complete innervation (dermatome, myotome, and osteotome) of the clavicle are C3-C7. Proximal BPB has been a standard practice for anaesthesia or analgesia for clavicle fracture surgeries. Hemidiaphragmatic paresis due to blockade of the phrenic nerve can be detrimental in polytrauma patients with lung injury or pneumothorax. Recently, the C5 ventral ramus block and selective supraclavicular nerve and upper trunk (SCUT block) with a low volume of LA have been described as site-specific and phrenic-sparing RA techniques for clavicle surgeries [3, 4]. However, BPB is contraindicated in patients with ipsilateral brachial plexus injury. Bhat et al. reported an incident of apnoea and cardiac arrest following paraesthesia-guided subclavian perivascular BPB in a polytrauma patient with undiagnosed brachial plexus injury [5]. The spread of injected LA to the subarachnoid space through the dural tear around the ruptured nerve roots resulted in total spinal anaesthesia and cardio-respiratory arrest. A CT myelogram after the resuscitation revealed a traumatic meningocele of the C8 nerve root. We avoided BPB in our patient, considering such dreaded consequences.
In 2017, Dr. Luis Valdes described CFPB as an RA technique for clavicle surgeries targeting the sensory nerves that traverse the clavipectoral fascia [1]. CFPB creates a field block by depositing the LA at the medial and lateral third of the clavicle between the clavipectoral fascia and the periosteum of the clavicle involving all the nerves piercing the fascia to enter the clavicle. Rosale et al. managed a case where CFPB with intravenous Dexmedetomidine sedation provided intraoperative surgical anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia up to 16 hours after the block [6]. However, the skin incision may not be covered with the CFPB alone. So, an additional supraclavicular nerve block, cervical plexus block, or skin infiltration is required. The spread of LA in CFPB depends on the integrity of the clavipectoral fascia, which is lost in displaced or comminuted fractures due to a breach in the continuity of the fascia around the fractured site. Hence, an additional injection or hematoma block at the fracture site may improve the quality of the RA. We opted for the modified CFPB, which covered all the innervations and provided optimal surgical anaesthesia or analgesia.
To conclude, the modified CFPB can be a better alternative to general anaesthesia or other available RA techniques in providing incision congruent surgical anaesthesia or postoperative analgesia for awake clavicle fracture surgery, especially in polytrauma patients with brachial plexus injury. However, randomized controlled trials are warranted for further validation.
References
1. Sonawane K, Dixit H, Balavenkatasubramanian J, Gurumoorthi P. Uncovering secrets of the beauty bone: a comprehensive review of anatomy and regional anaesthesia techniques of clavicle surgeries. Open J Orthop Rheumatol. 2021(6):19-29.
2. Sonawane K, Dharmapuri S, Saxena S, et al. Awake Single-Stage Bilateral Clavicle Surgeries Under Bilateral Clavipectoral Fascial Plane Blocks: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Cureus 13(12): e20537.
3. Diwan S, Feigl G, Nair A. C5 ventral ramus block for clavicle surgery: How low concerning the volume can we go? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):561-564.
4. Sivashanmugam T, Areti A, Selvum E, Diwan S, Pandian A. Selective blockade of supraclavicular nerves and upper trunk of brachial plexus “The SCUT block” towards a site-specific regional anaesthesia strategy for clavicle surgeries – A descriptive study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65(9):656–61.
5. Bhat VR, Kumar M, Sabapathy SR. Cardiac Arrest Following Brachial Plexus Block in a Patient with Missed Brachial Plexus Injury. Ind. J. Trauma. Anaesth. Crit. Care. 2003; 4(1): 177-178.
6. Rosales AL, Aypa NS. Clavipectoral plane block as a sole anesthetics technique for clavicle surgery – A case report. Anesth Pain Med. 2022;17(1):93-97.
| How to Cite this Article: Bhalerao CV, Mistry T, Jebaraj S, Balavenkatasubramanian J | Modified Clavipectoral Fascial Plane Block to The Rescue: Polytrauma Patient with Brachial Plexus Injury Undergoing Awake Clavicle Surgery | International Journal of Regional Anaesthesia | July-December 2022; 3(2): 107-109. |
